The test data will need updating to bring in line with the CDISC test pilot dummy subjects from {pharmaversesdtm} in the following ways:
[ ] dm_peds should be a copy of the current {pharmaversesdtm} dm data but dates of birth changed to make these a range of children's ages (whereas pharmaversesdtm test data comes from an adults study) - birth dates should all be complete (no partial) as not for us to recommend a rule to do in this case.
[ ] similarly vs_peds should use {pharmaversesdtm} vs as a starting point ensuring we have only height, weight, bmi and head circumference parameters and these are made more realistic for childrens levels and the assessment dates need to be made more realistic to align with each child's birth dates. e.g. don't keep VS dates < DM birth dates or it won't make sense when we come to derive the current age (as it would come out negative).
The test data will need updating to bring in line with the CDISC test pilot dummy subjects from {pharmaversesdtm} in the following ways:
dm_pedsshould be a copy of the current {pharmaversesdtm}dmdata but dates of birth changed to make these a range of children's ages (whereas pharmaversesdtm test data comes from an adults study) - birth dates should all be complete (no partial) as not for us to recommend a rule to do in this case.vs_pedsshould use {pharmaversesdtm}vsas a starting point ensuring we have only height, weight, bmi and head circumference parameters and these are made more realistic for childrens levels and the assessment dates need to be made more realistic to align with each child's birth dates. e.g. don't keep VS dates < DM birth dates or it won't make sense when we come to derive the current age (as it would come out negative).