Closed pawelru closed 5 months ago
@bms63 @pawelru does this one still need merging? couldn't tell sorry from the slack chat
Yes I think so. This would allow testing from the PR as opposed to merge blindly and wait for result from main. I think it's needed. We missed this somehow
OK thanks Pawel! As i'm still catching up post-holiday i tagged @bms63 here as reviewer to check he's happy and if so approve and merge.
I'm happy to merge this in, but I'm not sure what it is doing.
I always think of docs as .Rd
files but this does something with the site? Like it renders the site into a folder so we could take a look at it?
It's because it's a quarto book with .qmd
articles as opposed to package vignette in .Rmd
. On default, Quarto renders your book into the _site
subdirectory which then you can push to GH Pages (or not). This PR is just for include rendering process (but not deploy!) for each PR or feature branch. This way we can test changes before they go into the main branch and that's the whole point of this change. Currently everything is going to main without us knowing whether the book is renderable or not.
I'm going ahead and merge it. Please let me know if you encounter any difficulities in the PRs
It's because it's a quarto book with
.qmd
articles as opposed to package vignette in.Rmd
. On default, Quarto renders your book into the_site
subdirectory which then you can push to GH Pages (or not). This PR is just for include rendering process (but not deploy!) for each PR or feature branch. This way we can test changes before they go into the main branch and that's the whole point of this change. Currently everything is going to main without us knowing whether the book is renderable or not.I'm going ahead and merge it. Please let me know if you encounter any difficulities in the PRs
Hey @pawelru that makes sense. Thank you for explaining. Maybe a section in the Readme around actions would be a nice to have?