Feature Request: Implement mapping functions conceptually similar to `assign_no_ct()`/`assign_ct()`

[ramiromagno]

Feature Idea

As per the example pseudocode provided in the template code: https://github.com/pharmaverse/sdtm.oak/blob/main/inst/cm_domain/create_cm_template.R, implement functionality equivalent to assign_no_ct()/assign_ct() either as one function, or two, still to be worked out.

Relevant Input

The relevant input(s) should be:

• The source raw dataset
• The input variable(s) that need to be mapped
• The names of the output variable(s) in the resulting dataset
• An optional parameter taking an object representing the appropriate controlled terminology

Relevant Output

The output should be a new dataset containing the new variables (as indicated by their names in one of the inputs.

Reproducible Example/Pseudo Code

No response

[rammprasad]

@ramiromagno - assign_ct() needs controlled terminology as a mandatory parameter.

[ramiromagno]

@rammprasad : I was thinking of having one single function, and having that controlled terminology as optional: if provided, then internally run the equivalent of assign_ct(), otherwise, default to assign_no_ct().

[rammprasad]

if it is ok, lets keep one function per algorithm. It will be easier to maintain in the long run.

[ramiromagno]

Hi @rammprasad : could you provide a mock-up example of how the controlled terminology should be used in assign_ct()?