photonstorm
commented
6 years ago I'm afraid I'm going to close this issue. Not because we're not adding Containers, they are in R&D at the moment. But because I want GitHub issues to be used for actual code / implementation issues with the API. My perfect world is 'Issues: 0' (like inbox zero), with nothing lingering about.
In order for you to use this issue to track development we would have to remember to keep updating it, or referencing the issue number in our commits, and frankly, this is just too much work for us. I'd rather you Watch the repo and monitor from there, or keep track in the Dev Logs for a more casual observation of progress.
vpmedia
Hello!
I'm opening this to track the development status of the Container (Layer) feature. I need this to be able to port my existing application, for multi screen layouts and gui components pure flat display list makes refactoring more difficult. Ideally I could switch my app dependency between Phaser 2 and Phaser 3, this is the one major thing what I've found so far which makes porting a bit more time consuming.
https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser3-wip/tree/master/wip/container https://phaser.io/phaser3/devlog/73 (Layers mentioned here) http://www.html5gamedevs.com/topic/36051-does-phaser-3-need-containers/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phaser3-dev/lBzGlTu3gQg https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phaser3-dev/CoKnWK56bk8
Thank you!