PhysicGroup Childs dont get Body

[BurnedToast]

When I use

bullets = game.add.physicsGroup(Phaser.Physics.P2JS)
bullets.createMultiple(10, 'plasmabullet')

The created dont have a body, because of line 111 in Group

this.enableBody = false;

should be

this.enableBody = enableBody ;

But changing that line may have some other impacts!?

[gabehollombe]

Can reproduce.

I've noticed this also affects constructing groups where you pass enableBody to the normal group constructor.

Example code:

    // This doesn't work.
    var physGroup = game.add.physicsGroup(Phaser.Physics.ARCADE);
    var physGroupChild = physGroup.create(0, 0, 'bullet')
    if (physGroupChild.body === null) {
        console.error("Expecting physGroupChild.body to not be null but is null.")
    }

    // Neither does this.
    var groupWithPhysicsInConstructor = game.add.group(game.world, 'my group', false, true, Phaser.Physics.ARCADE)
    var groupWithPhysicsChild = groupWithPhysicsInConstructor.create(0, 0, 'bullet')
    if (groupWithPhysicsChild.body === null) {
        console.error("Expecting groupWithPhysicsChild.body to not be null but is null.")
    }

    // Obviously, this will.
    var groupWithoutPhysicsInConstructor = game.add.group()
    groupWithoutPhysicsInConstructor.enableBody = true
    groupWithoutPhysicsInConstructor.physicsBodyType = Phaser.Physics.ARCADE
    var groupWithoutPhysicsChild = groupWithoutPhysicsInConstructor.create(0, 0, 'bullet')
    if (groupWithoutPhysicsChild.body === null) {
        console.error("Expecting groupWithoutPhysicsChild.body to not be null but is null.")
    }

Example Fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/MUa38/2/

[photonstorm]

Ah yes, if you look the 'enableBody' parameter got assigned to the enableBodyDebug value by mistake. Fixed in dev.

[gabehollombe]

@photonstorm fast fixing! =-) Are the example Fiddles too much in this case? I'm just trying to follow the contrib guidelines.

[photonstorm]

Sometimes they are really useful. Othertimes it's such an obvious error they're too much. Sadly I guess it's not easy for you to tell which :) You could start by just describing the problem, if I can't work it out I'll ask for more info / example. Should save time for you?

[gabehollombe]

@photonstorm Makes sense. Should we update the contribution guidelines to say something like 'If it's a simple bug report, use your best judgement to decide if a demo example is needed' ?

[photonstorm]

Agreed, I've added something to that effect in the guide.