Closed phate closed 4 months ago
@haved Here is my version for handling volatile nodes in the memory state encoder. It was heavily inspired by your PR, but handles a few things slightly differently. What I do not have yet is unit tests for the volatile cases. Can you wait for another day?
The failing tests (for steensgaard agnostic) is due to the tightening and not having all nodes in the if-then-else statement. I will dig into it.
@phate yes I can wait for tests in this PR before it is merged
@haved The PR is now ready for review. I did not manage to add unit tests yet, but consider the successful runs of the steensgaard-agnostic and andersen-agnostic checks test enough. I opened issue #488 to not forget about the unit tests.
This PR does the following: