The History section - apart from the fact that is in the reverse order and is hidden inside the README - is out of date.
No CHANGELOG file is given.
Each time that one has to check for changes is forced to do a compare between versions.
This method is obviously not easy and sometimes it's very hard (read: a PITA) to understand what is changed.
The CHANGELOG would give us a better understanding of changes through versions at a glance.
(I think that it would be also useful for you).
By the way, do you follow a semantic versioning convention?
The History section - apart from the fact that is in the reverse order and is hidden inside the README - is out of date.
No CHANGELOG file is given.
Each time that one has to check for changes is forced to do a compare between versions. This method is obviously not easy and sometimes it's very hard (read: a PITA) to understand what is changed.
The CHANGELOG would give us a better understanding of changes through versions at a glance.
(I think that it would be also useful for you).
By the way, do you follow a semantic versioning convention?
Thank you!