Open TravisCarden opened 1 month ago
We should either make the URLs truly hackable (i.e., add Views with the appropriate contextual filters) or remove the directory separators from the URLs
I'm wondering what most authors who want a blog site would reasonably expect.
I lean towards making these URLs truly hackable, thus providing a "blog archive" functionality right out of the box. I feel like that's what one would expect from a blog site, and a recipe designed to set up a blog. What do you think? Want to file a PR for that?
+1 for
We should either make the URLs truly hackable (i.e., add Views with the appropriate contextual filters) or remove the directory separators from the URLs
I think this pretty much closes #105, then. If we're going to make the URLs hackable, then the blog
view will be needed!
The URL alias patterns for events, blog posts, and webform imply "hackability" by their use of directory separators (
/blog/[node:created:html_month]/[node:title]
,/event/[node:field_date_time:value-custom:Y]/[node:title]
, and/form/[node:title]
). These give the impression that there are pages at/event
and/event/2024
, for example. We should either make the URLs truly hackable (i.e., add Views with the appropriate contextual filters) or remove the directory separators from the URLs (e.g.,/blog-[node:created:html_month]-[node:title]
). c.f. related https://github.com/phenaproxima/starshot-prototype/issues/133.