Closed julesjacobsen closed 2 years ago
given the domain of phenopackets, we could be a little more concise with
<parent>
<groupId>org.phenopackets.tools</groupId>
<artifactId>phenopacket-tools</artifactId>
<version>0.0.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
but I agree in any case that phenotools
is suboptimal
Sounds good to me, both the new groupId
and artifactId
an.
Thanks @pnrobinson - remember to delete all stale branches now and branch from develop!
'Phenotools' is, in my opinion, a poor name as it is rather generic and nondescript.
Phenopacket-tools
is a bit more specific and I suggest we use this. This would require changing thegroupId
,artifactId
s and the package names. It will completely break all existing code, so needs to happen before pushing to maven central.@pnrobinson @ielis any objections?