Closed KatieWoe closed 1 year ago
Thanks @KatieWoe. The data from the chart is a bit outdated since it was last updated May 2015. But the data in the sim is from February 2022 and is in this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVfWNMYeXEo5dAzQUI5ZKyZwIlnLiQkd/edit#gid=1440307797.
I checked with the table there and it seems Po-221 should form. Sorry for the confusion!
Hopefully this clears any other potential similar issues. Closing.
This is the spreadsheet we are using and want testing done with: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVfWNMYeXEo5dAzQUI5ZKyZwIlnLiQkd/edit#gid=1440307797. But when we added the nuclides up to 94 protons (see #42), this spreadsheet wasn't updated. So we need to update the spreadsheet.
The spreadsheet is now updated with the AtomIdentifier values up to 94 protons and 146 neutrons.
Test device Samsung Operating System Win 11 Browser Firefox Problem description For https://github.com/phetsims/qa/issues/988. It is possible to make Po 221 even though the graph indicates it shouldn't exist. It can either be decayed into or built outright.
Visuals
Troubleshooting information: