useQuantitativeDescriptions name violates PhET naming convention

[pixelzoom]

From the code-review checklist:

• [ ] Naming for Property values: All AXON/Property instances should be declared with the suffix Property. For example, if a visible property is added, it should have the name visibleProperty instead of simply visible. This will help to avoid confusion with non-Property definitions.

In MolarityScreenView:

    // Determines whether qualitative or quantitative a11y descriptions are used.
    const useQuantitativeDescriptions = new DerivedProperty( [ valuesVisibleProperty ], () => {
      return valuesVisibleProperty.value;
    } );

This should be named useQuantitativeDescriptionsProperty. By convention, a Property is always named with a "Property" suffix.

This name also needs to be fixed in MolarityScreenSummaryNode and *Describer classes.

[twant]

Thanks for catching this, @pixelzoom. Updated and assigned back over to you.

[pixelzoom]

Perfect @twant, thanks for making the change. Closing.