Closed pixelzoom closed 8 years ago
@schmitzware This is not something that you need to do. It will likely be done by @jessegreenberg or @andrewadare.
@ariel-phet is this something that you would like @jessegreenberg and/or @andrewadare to work on now? As mentioned in https://github.com/phetsims/rutherford-scattering/issues/59#issue-139980432 we could either generalize the approach used by build-an-atom and isotopes-and-atomic-mass (hopefully already in shred) or @andrewadare could work on a new representation, which could replace the one in shred.
@jessegreenberg it seems like it is worth investigating generalizing the approach used in build-an-atom. It just needs to "look" reasonable, but I would advice consulting with @andrewadare to makes sure that the reasonable look does not break any major rules of nuclear physics!
Sounds good @ariel-phet, thanks. I will consult with @andrewadare before proceeding.
@andrewadare and I discussed the representation and some possible alternatives. One possibility that @andrewadare suggested was to use the Woods-Saxon formula to model the density distribution of nucleons as a function of the radius. ( http://slideplayer.com/slide/8620364/ )
The result might look like this Glauber Monte Carlo model, but with a single nucleus. (http://entropybound.blogspot.com/2008/05/phobos-glauber-monte-carlo.html)
Not sure if this would have implications for the 'unstable' animations in isotopes-and-atomic-mass and build-an-atom.
@ariel-phet for now I will use the algorithm in shred as it is, since it isn't fundamentally rule breaking. I am not sure if the representation shown in the Glauber Monte Carlo model would be desirable or important for the learning goals of sims that use shred.
Looking pretty good:
But I had to make some changes in shred and I would like to ask a couple of questions about ParticleAtom.js before making the commit.
If we go through with this new representation, we will need to also replace icons for
The screenshot looks quite good to me!
Home screen icon and radio button icon both match the new nucleus representation.
I think that completes this issue, ready for review.
This was verified, closing.
@ariel-phet asked to create this issue in 3/10/16 dev meeting.
Requests are:
(1) Refine the look of the nucleus in the Rutherford Atom screen, so that it looks more spherical and doesn't contain holes. Either use the approach in build-an-atom, or have @andrewadare come up with something else. If something else, consider apply it to build-an-atom (create an issue).
(2) Programmatically generate the icon for the Rutherford Atom screen, so that the look is the same. Jettison the related .png and .ai files.