Open pixelzoom opened 7 months ago
Regarding the dynamic layout problem...
It looks like others may have encountered this previously. In https://github.com/phetsims/scenery-phet/commit/1927a5556fa11db6ee7127584dd687ac811a5985 for https://github.com/phetsims/scenery-phet/issues/575, @jessegreenberg added options wrapSpeedRadioButtonGroupInPanel
and speedRadioButtonGroupPanelOptions
, presumably because wrapping the radio button group in a panel makes the dynamic layout behave properly. Those options were used only in neuron, but now we also needed to use them in solar-system-common (my-solar-system, keplers-laws).
PhET-iO makes this a problem for all sims. So I recommend that those options be deleted, and the dynamic layout be generalized so that is always works properly.
Regarding the positioning of the speed radio button group, I recommend replacing option speedRadioButtonGroupOnLeft: boolean
with speedRadioButtonGroupPosition: 'left' | 'right' | 'bottom'
('top' is probably not necessary), then handling the layout accordingly.
The ugly/unsafe workaround for 'bottom' placement in SolarSystemCommonTimeControlNode should then be deleted.
Identified by @arouinfar during review of MSS PhET-iO. And according to @matthew-blackman, this will also be an issue for PM"DL.
TimeControlNode has 2 significant problems for PhET-iO:
(1) It needs a PhET-iO design. It's over-instrumented, and doesn't support opting out/in of instrumented some subcomponents. See for example https://github.com/phetsims/my-solar-system/issues/301.
(2) It has dynamic layout problems. See problem description and recommended solution in https://github.com/phetsims/my-solar-system/issues/300.
It's unclear whether this is blocking for MSS PhET-iO 1.3 (https://github.com/phetsims/my-solar-system/issues/282).