The original C code with xxd -b testdata/short produces this:
00000000: 01001110 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101001 01110011 Now is
00000006: 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110100 the t
0000000c: 01101001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01100110 01101111 ime fo
00000012: 01110010 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101100 00100000 r all
00000018: 01100111 01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01101101 good m
0000001e: 01100101 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 en to
00000024: 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 00100000 01110100 come t
0000002a: 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 o the
00000030: 01100001 01101001 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 aid of
00000036: 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01101001 01110010 their
0000003c: 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110010 01110100 01111001 party
00000042: 00101110 00001010 ..
but pxxd -b testdata/short produces this:
00000000: 4e 6f 77 20 69 73 Now is
00000006: 20 74 68 65 20 74 the t
0000000c: 69 6d 65 20 66 6f ime fo
00000012: 72 20 61 6c 6c 20 r all
00000018: 67 6f 6f 64 20 6d good m
0000001e: 65 6e 20 74 6f 20 en to
00000024: 63 6f 6d 65 20 74 come t
0000002a: 6f 20 74 68 65 20 o the
00000030: 61 69 64 20 6f 66 aid of
00000036: 20 74 68 65 69 72 their
0000003c: 20 70 61 72 74 79 party
00000042: 2e 0a ..
Why didn't I have a unit test that would have caught this?
The original C code with
xxd -b testdata/short
produces this:but
pxxd -b testdata/short
produces this:Why didn't I have a unit test that would have caught this?