The most relevant part in simple terms: The MPL allows use of the unchanged library in closed source (commercial or non-commercial) software. But changes have to be open sourced.
Contributors agreed (archive) to go from the AGPL to a more permissive license. Even to Apache/MIT, but I'd prefer to go to a compromise first, and maybe further later.
The most relevant part in simple terms: The MPL allows use of the unchanged library in closed source (commercial or non-commercial) software. But changes have to be open sourced.
Contributors agreed (archive) to go from the AGPL to a more permissive license. Even to Apache/MIT, but I'd prefer to go to a compromise first, and maybe further later.
Closes #86