Closed brettviren closed 4 years ago
Oh, this was my mistake, I didn't test the 3.15.09 build. It looks like the only difference between 3.15.09 and the stable branch at the moment is this commit, which makes the cetmodules
dependency optional:
Does trace@stable build for you without the cetmodules dependency? If so, I think make that
depends_on('cetmodules@1.01.01:', type='build', when='3.15.09')
and it's good to go
Yes, limiting the cetmodules
dependency to 3.15.09 lets trace@stable
still install. Thanks for noticing this.
Locally I now have commits for #6 and #7 interleaved so maybe I push what I have to #7 and we close #6?
(I need to figure out a way to keep this kind of "PR branching" separate!)
Closing as it is merged into #7.
This is needed for #5 for me to make these work:
@philiprodrigues I wonder why the lack of
cetmodules
didn't trip up your builds. Maybe you have some mixing of UPS + Spack environments? Or, maybe building viaspack install appfwk
hides this missing dependency?