Open filippodebortoli opened 1 year ago
I think the first one is well-formed in the XML sense but horned is complaining because of the lack of ontology tags inside. It doesn't know that "Ontology" or "Declaration" is OWL.
Horned could assume a default namespace if otherwise not given. I think that would be sensible outcome also.
This snippet of code:
panics if I use the following example (taken from the OWL Wikipedia page):
and returns successfully if I add the
xmlns
attribute to the ontology:Is it intended behavior? I would expect the first ontology to be as well-formed as the second one.