Closed bambooforest closed 10 years ago
This also applies to (and is already updated in SPA_LangNamesCodes):
yux -> ykg
so this issue is about the current aggregated / phoneme level files being wrong, but the issue will be closed when they're next re-generated by the R script, because the underlying problem at the SPA / UPSID level has already been fixed. Is that right?
Exactly.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Daniel McCloy notifications@github.com wrote:
so this issue is about the current aggregated / phoneme level files being wrong, but the issue will be closed when they're next re-generated by the R script, because the underlying problem at the SPA / UPSID level has already been fixed. Is that right?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/phoible/phoible/issues/18#issuecomment-48497160.
fixed by #20
This language code [zoh] is wrong. It should be [zoc], as per WALS identification of Wonderly 1951a
http://wals.info/refdb/record/Wonderly-1951b
which would also align the SPA inventory with the UPSID inventory under the same reference.
The code change has been updated in the SPA langname codes file
https://github.com/phoible/phoible/blob/master/data/SPA/SPA_LangNamesCodes.tsv
and the aggregated and phoneme level files will be updated when they are newly generated.