phon31x / Tiny_polybar

44 stars 6 forks source link

major changes for better UX #4

Closed AmmarHaddadi closed 1 year ago

AmmarHaddadi commented 1 year ago

Hi , this is my first ever PR I really hope it gets accepted

I can say we did a pretty amazing job fixing a 5 years issue for non i3/bspwm users with nothing but polybar itself

pietryszak commented 1 year ago

It's shoud open on down, because it's extra bar if you use polybar. The idea was to open it like a tray bar. I use it's like this: main polybar with a small icon to open tiny polybar. The tiny_polyabr opens down with weather widget and network widget. Main polybar stays at up. @AmmarHaddadi

But @phon31x shoud decide that we change a Tiny_bar. A solution to open and close is good idea, but i preffer to display tiny_bar on down of other, like on video on readme.

"I can say we did a pretty amazing job fixing a https://github.com/polybar/polybar/issues/425 for non i3/bspwm users with nothing but polybar itself"...great work @AmmarHaddadi @phon31x @pietryszak

@AmmarHaddadi If you know python, mayby you are able to create some kind of option, one to open tiny_bar with current default approuch to open down of polybar, and second option just like this PR. Lest people choose ;)

AmmarHaddadi commented 1 year ago

Part1 : this PR wasn't actually wise

@pietryszak actually I think that the original idea has an aesthetic purpose , while I shifted it to solve a problem that I faced , and if we merge those 2 ideas like you said we'll endup with a mess or a swiss army knife image

Part 2 (u can ignore this) : how to merge the 2

maybe you are able to create some kind of option, one to ...

if anyone wants to do so , then you really need that python script , you will create 2 bars , and a py script for each so u can use 2 mouse buttons to do 4 things , but as I said , neither me or Phon31x would like to XD

Conclusion

so yeah I think I better leave this as @phon31x wants it , and leave my fork next to it , that's how GitHub works lol

pietryszak commented 1 year ago

Part1 : this PR wasn't actually wise

@pietryszak actually I think that the original idea has an aesthetic purpose , while I shifted it to solve a problem that I faced , and if we merge those 2 ideas like you said we'll endup with a mess or a swiss army knife image

Part 2 (u can ignore this) : how to merge the 2

maybe you are able to create some kind of option, one to ...

if anyone wants to do so , then you really need that python script , you will create 2 bars , and a py script for each so u can use 2 mouse buttons to do 4 things , but as I said , neither me or Phon31x would like to XD

Conclusion

so yeah I think I better leave this as @phon31x wants it , and leave my fork next to it , that's how GitHub works lol

Yes, I think this is the best solution. We stay in original way of working on this repo. Any you are free to change it with python script in yours forked version :)

pietryszak commented 1 year ago

We stay at original idea, @AmmarHaddadi maintain version python in it's own repo