hfiguiere
commented
11 years ago Exiftool might just be doing the right thing. Do you a link to the original file?
Open ajft opened 11 years ago
hfiguiere
commented
11 years ago Exiftool might just be doing the right thing. Do you a link to the original file?
ajft
commented
11 years ago I've uploaded the original file to http://ajft.org/photos/837-630/837-630_02.JPG
Exiftool reports the full set of tags, but when I imported it into openphoto.ajft.org it didn't import all tags. Import was done with Google chrome on a Mac .
Adrian
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Hubert Figuière notifications@github.comwrote:
Exiftool might just be doing the right thing. Do you a link to the original file?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/photo/frontend/issues/1338#issuecomment-21426384 .
Adrian Tritschler Melbourne, Australia
hfiguiere
commented
11 years ago The browser shouldn't matter, this is done on the backend in PHP.
ajft
commented
11 years ago On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Hubert Figuière notifications@github.comwrote:
The browser shouldn't matter, this is done on the backend in PHP.
True, I was just trying to get my thoughts in order of how that photo got uploaded.
Especially now that I have a counter example where similar tags did get imported.
$ exiftool -Keywords -s 837-630_01.JPG Keywords : France, 837-630, 837-630_01, APS-film, FRA, geo:lat=45.14167015, geo:lon=6.11672402, geotagged, La Villette, l'Alpe d'Huez, Oz, Rhône-Alpes, scanned, wideopenroad, wor2001b2a
My workflow is:
Photo 837-630_02 .. 09 which ended up with tags that didn't import were all tagged under XP on the Mac Photo 837-630_01 with the tags that did work was tagged on Windows 7
Running a command line exiftool on any of the photos afterwards shows all the tags.
Adrian
Adrian Tritschler Melbourne, Australia
hfiguiere
commented
11 years ago It seems that the -01 file has a charset indicated in the IPTC. Not the -02 file. - not sure if that's the problem, I haven't dug into the PHP code for that.
What if you don't use geosetter and it is just about Picasa on Windows 7 vs Picasa on Mac?
ajft
commented
11 years ago Hubert,
I'll test that, but won't be able to for a few more hours.
Adrian
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Hubert Figuière notifications@github.comwrote:
It seems that the -01 file has a charset indicated in the IPTC. Not the -02 file. - not sure if that's the problem, I haven't dug into the PHP code for that.
What if you don't use geosetter and it is just about Picasa on Windows 7 vs Picasa on Mac?
Adrian Tritschler Melbourne, Australia
I thought this had been logged (and fixed) ages ago but found out today that the problem is still present.
Importing photos with non-ascii characters in the EXIF "keywords" field gets them imported into the "tags" of the photos, but only up until the first non-ascii character, after that all following tags are ignored. You can still enter non-ascii characters as tags through the web interface, but it is very laborious to visit every photo and fix up the tags broken on import.
eg $ exiftool -Keywords 837-630_02.JPG Keywords : cycling, flag, FRA, France, geo:lat=45.08716112, geo:lon=6.05768612, wor2001b2a, geotagged, Huez, l'Alpe d'Huez, Rhône-Alpes, TDF, 837-630, 837-630_02, APS-film, scanned
Then see http://openphoto.ajft.org/p/5gu/view, the tags are:
837-630, 837-630_02 2001 APS-film cycling flag FRA France geo:lat=45.08716112 geo:lon=6.05768612 geotagged Huez July l'Alpe d'Huez Rh
Note that the last tag is "Rh" which is the first two characters from "Rhône-Alpes"