Closed sneakypete81 closed 11 years ago
Deferring to @walkah on this one for comments.
@walkah: any comments? In particular:
I think Python 3 support is more valuable than any potential problems with the above, but would value your opinion before merging this.
I've had a crack at this, with the aim of supporting both Python 2 and 3 from the same codebase. This involved:
As a result of the above, we can support Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3. Maintaining support for 2.5 at the same time as 3.x is difficult (and messy).
To avoid conflicts, I'd like to wait until the last few PRs are merged before doing any more.
Any comments?