Closed sagikazarmark closed 8 years ago
ah, i meant to ask about that. if you think it would be convenient, lets re-allow Body in the HttpMethodsClient. but it would mean that the protected send() method needs to handle the body, as the message factory does not know about it.
Since they are in the same repo, I don't think it's a problem to implement some logic in the send method.
To tell the truth, it is very unlikely that I am going to use that feature. But I think they could be useful in some cases.
if you want to work on it, do it. otherwise we should remove the class for now and only re-add it when its used somewhere.
The class? Body is not one class, but an interface and a set of classes. Go ahead and remove it for now.
This can be close with #6
Originally we wanted to remove Body implementations. Now, that HttpMethodsClient is an actual implementation and not an interface, we should reconsider keeping bodies and using them in the MethodsClient.