Open fredericch opened 2 months ago
In my opinion, nl2br()
is a blunt tool to quickly convert some plain text into semantically suboptimal HTML (e.g. two consecutive newlines are better represented as a "paragraph break"). I would leave the function as is, especially since it is easy to do your own conversion using str_replace()
, for instance.
And I'm really not keen on adding a boolean parameter anyway; these are okayish when used as named parameters, but still not quite right, in my opinion.
kind of in a same boat, if there were no other choice then yes but as you demonstrated yourself, you can manage without.
So would it make sense to change the behavior? Do a real "nl-2-br" operation and not a "nl-add-br"? :)
That way the function name would be aligned with its behavior.
I would suggest, as a next step, to write to the internal mail list.
Description
The function name of nl2br() suggests that it is a "replace" operation but is actually an "insert" operation.
Would it be possible to add a 3rd parameter so the function would actually replace the newline characters?
nl2br(string $string, bool $use_xhtml = true, bool $replace = false): string
The confusion with the name and the need for the 3rd parameter is obvious in the user contributed notes (most popular one and following ones): https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.nl2br.php#49516
The advantages of the 3rd parameter (instead of changing the behavior):