As I was going through the PHP stubs of the Solr Extension, I found links to docs.php.net, which apparently is severely outdated, that says the latest php is 8.1 beta, and still has docs en, which I imagine could be as outdated. I'm gonna update the links to https://www.php.net/manual/*
it also says "Documentation is built here four times a day."
Questions that popped shall it be named dev, if its dev. so no reliability expected ? or have redirector to php.net/manual ? or is it useful the way it is? or sites.php needs to get updated to reflect the current status?
I'm just wondering and thought to bring that to your attention,
As I was going through the PHP stubs of the Solr Extension, I found links to docs.php.net, which apparently is severely outdated, that says the latest php is 8.1 beta, and still has docs en, which I imagine could be as outdated. I'm gonna update the links to https://www.php.net/manual/*
From: https://www.php.net/sites.php
it also says "Documentation is built here four times a day."
Questions that popped shall it be named dev, if its dev. so no reliability expected ? or have redirector to php.net/manual ? or is it useful the way it is? or sites.php needs to get updated to reflect the current status?
I'm just wondering and thought to bring that to your attention,
Cheers, Omar