Closed wspr closed 13 years ago
I don't think so, see this thread: http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2011-July/029653.html
Aha! (My reasoning was that if it's in scripts/ in TL then make install
should do likewise.)
Well, in that case can we get the .lua file moved out from the scripts directory? It should be enough to provide a .tds.zip file specifying this (and probably a note to delete the old one) in the next CTAN upload.
Yes, I'll do this. The makefile now generates a .tds.zip
if requested. I'm a bit hesitant to upload the new version right now since I see this as a slippery slope: once I start fixing one application of \mathcode
, once more I'd feel the urge to fix the whole universe. Probably we should rather make yet another package that abstracts away the \mathcode
(similar to the nascent fontparams
package), and urge everybody to use it.
Sure, not an important point at all. So while the .lua file is installed in scripts/, is it indeed worth pointing the Makefile to the correct location?
It's probably not worth it either, since everything is working fine for me in TL2011 :)
Unless I'm mistaken (still on TL2010; just about to update), the .lua file should be installed into $(texmfhome)/scripts/lualatex-math :