Open blinard-BIOINFO opened 2 years ago
After more investigation, this is due to C11 vs C17.
@nromashchenko Any chance you accept this ? Any chance you accept this ? This PR is more than 6 month old. Currently I just cannot clone clappas and use IPK as a submodule without forcing IPK to branch clapas_compatibility
Yes, sorry, swamped with other things right now.
The problem with CLAPPAS is that it depends on a very old version where IPK and I2L were the same thing. That is, you have all code for building databases in your project, while you actually only need a few important headers + serialization.
In the future, we should update CLAPPAS (and SHERPAS) so that it depends only on this repository: https://github.com/phylo42/I2L
Then, this request belongs to another repo. These files don't exist here anymore. However, changing switching to I2L is not just a drop-in update: I did not release XPAS versions for a long time, and the update contains quite a few changes including renaming the namespace where all classes live.
What I suggest you to do right now is to stick with the compatibility branch, and when you have a "bug cleaning day" at work, update to I2L and test the current version of I2L. I will accept the request with no problem then.
I can help with figuring out the update process if needed.
Ok, btu the time being I force clappas to use this branch and when as a second step I will move to I2L.
_phylo_kmer_db
object do not allow operator '=' (delete), but allows move assignment.However, its current definition contains the
noexcept
qualifier which raise an error at compilation time:I removed the
noexcept
qualifier which solves the issue until you deal with implicit exception-specification.