search

phyloref / phyloref-ontology

Phyloreferencing Ontology and OWL DL reasoning with phyloreferences
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
5 stars 1 forks source link

Missing license #22

Closed hlapp closed 6 years ago

hlapp commented 6 years ago

I notice we're missing a license / terms of reuse statement here. Any objections to choosing CC0, does anyone feel strongly about having CC-BY instead?

ncellinese commented 6 years ago

No objections

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Hilmar Lapp notifications@github.com wrote:

I notice we're missing a license / terms of reuse statement here. Any objections to choosing CC0, does anyone feel strongly about having CC-BY instead?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

gaurav commented 6 years ago

I agree that CC-0 is the right license for the ontology!

Does the Demonstration phylogeny for Campanulaceae belong to us? If not, we might want to cite it rather than trying to license that under CC-0 as well.

hlapp commented 6 years ago

Does the Demonstration phylogeny for Campanulaceae belong to us?

Yes. All your tree are belong to us. 😈