Closed gaurav closed 5 years ago
See comment on #8 re: supporting competency question(s).
See other comment on #8, which applies here too. Including in particular my skepticism about there being no superproperty.
On hold until we resolve https://github.com/phyloref/phyloref-ontology/issues/8#issuecomment-391907602
In light of the conclusion from recent discussions that at least for purposes of phylogenetic clade definitions there is no discernible difference between a specifier and a referent to a taxon concept, this should be closed. See also https://github.com/phyloref/phyloref-ontology/issues/8#issuecomment-448387121.
Also, #29 introduces and proposes phyloref:includes_TU
for signifying a TU to be included in a clade.
Agreed: phyloref:includes_TU
is pretty much exactly what this issue was going for! Closing.
Proposed term:
has_internal_specifier
(object property) Definition: Associates an internal specifier with a phyloreference. Domain: Phyloreference Range: Specifier See also: scratch ontology, PHYX contextCompetency questions:
On hold until we resolve https://github.com/phyloref/phyloref-ontology/issues/8#issuecomment-391907602