All of the source code should, per GPL and established standard, contain a license header such as that below: (Replacing and with relevant data.) While I understand that you desire to keep the source code simple for the ease of usage by the students, all source code should have a license header on it. One example where this is necessary is what happens if a student gives the code to their friend. If the original student fails to supply a copy of the GPL to their friend, they have just committed copyright infringement. (Which is a federal offense) This also creates a massive legal mess for the student who received the code should they decide to share it as they are also - unknowingly - committing copyright infringement. While this may seem abstract and a distant issue, I personally know several people who have had issues with their code being stolen due to a failure to properly indicate its licensing.
(I know you guys are probably sick of me going on about this, so this will be the last time I bring it up. I just need a written record [ for my own protection ] that I have notified the group about issues I see in how the system is copyrighted. )
TL;DR, While not strictly required, it is bad form and extremely rude to refrain from putting a copyright/copyleft notice on all copies of the source code and can cause a host of legal problems.
/*
Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Christopher Orban
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
*/
All of the source code should, per GPL and established standard, contain a license header such as that below: (Replacing and with relevant data.) While I understand that you desire to keep the source code simple for the ease of usage by the students, all source code should have a license header on it. One example where this is necessary is what happens if a student gives the code to their friend. If the original student fails to supply a copy of the GPL to their friend, they have just committed copyright infringement. (Which is a federal offense) This also creates a massive legal mess for the student who received the code should they decide to share it as they are also - unknowingly - committing copyright infringement. While this may seem abstract and a distant issue, I personally know several people who have had issues with their code being stolen due to a failure to properly indicate its licensing.
(I know you guys are probably sick of me going on about this, so this will be the last time I bring it up. I just need a written record [ for my own protection ] that I have notified the group about issues I see in how the system is copyrighted. )
TL;DR, While not strictly required, it is bad form and extremely rude to refrain from putting a copyright/copyleft notice on all copies of the source code and can cause a host of legal problems.
/*