codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 59.85% // Head: 59.62% // Decreases project coverage by -0.23% :warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
cb22213) compared to base (29051b2). Patch coverage: 40.22% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #598 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 59.85% 59.62% -0.24% ========================================== Files 153 155 +2 Lines 7740 7811 +71 ========================================== + Hits 4633 4657 +24 - Misses 3107 3154 +47 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `59.62% <40.22%> (-0.24%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/pi-top/pi-top-Python-SDK/pull/598?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [packages/simulation/pitop/simulation/simsprite.py](https://codecov.io/gh/pi-top/pi-top-Python-SDK/pull/598/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvc2ltdWxhdGlvbi9waXRvcC9zaW11bGF0aW9uL3NpbXNwcml0ZS5weQ==) | `41.66% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [packages/simulation/pitop/simulation/sprites.py](https://codecov.io/gh/pi-top/pi-top-Python-SDK/pull/598/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvc2ltdWxhdGlvbi9waXRvcC9zaW11bGF0aW9uL3Nwcml0ZXMucHk=) | `43.45% <30.95%> (-4.64%)` | :arrow_down: | | [packages/simulation/pitop/simulation/port\_label.py](https://codecov.io/gh/pi-top/pi-top-Python-SDK/pull/598/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvc2ltdWxhdGlvbi9waXRvcC9zaW11bGF0aW9uL3BvcnRfbGFiZWwucHk=) | `40.54% <40.54%> (ø)` | | | [packages/simulation/pitop/simulation/color.py](https://codecov.io/gh/pi-top/pi-top-Python-SDK/pull/598/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvc2ltdWxhdGlvbi9waXRvcC9zaW11bGF0aW9uL2NvbG9yLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pi-top):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Main changes
Componentableusing a newPortLabelcomponent.Screenshots (feature, test output, profiling, dev tools etc)
[insert screenshots here]
Other notes (e.g. implementation quirks, edge cases, questions / issues)
-
Manual testing tips
-
Tag anyone who definitely needs to review or help
-