pier-cli / pier

A Linux script management CLI written in Rust
MIT License
541 stars 34 forks source link

Enable Link-Time Optimization (LTO) #97

Open zamazan4ik opened 2 weeks ago

zamazan4ik commented 2 weeks ago

Hi!

I noticed that in the Cargo.toml file Link-Time Optimization (LTO) for the project is not enabled. I suggest switching it on since it will reduce the binary size (always a good thing to have) and will likely improve the application's performance a bit (not critical at all for this tool but anyway).

I suggest enabling LTO only for the Release builds so as not to sacrifice the developers' experience while working on the project since LTO consumes an additional amount of time to finish the compilation routine. If you think that a regular Release build should not be affected by such a change as well, then I suggest adding an additional dist or release-lto profile where additionally to regular release optimizations LTO will also be added. Such a change simplifies life for maintainers and others interested in the project persons who want to build the most performant version of the application. Using ThinLTO should also help to reduce the build-time overhead with LTO. If we enable it on the Cargo profile level, users, who install the application with cargo install, will get the LTO-optimized version "automatically". E.g., check cargo-outdated Release profile.

Basically, it can be enabled with the following lines:

[profile.release]
lto = true

I have made quick local tests (Fedora 40, the latest pier sources version): enabling lto = true dropped the pier binary size from 1.8 Mib to 1.4 Mib.

Thank you.

P.S. It's more like an improvement idea rather than a bug. I created the issue just because the Discussions are disabled for the repo for now.

BenSchZA commented 1 week ago

Hey @zamazan4ik! Thanks for the idea. I see no issue with enabling this for release builds. Did you see any performance improvement when you enabled this (out of curiosity)? Please feel free to submit a PR with the necessary changes, so that you'll be acknowledged as a contributor :)

zamazan4ik commented 1 week ago

Did you see any performance improvement when you enabled this (out of curiosity)?

Nope, I didn't since I even didn't try to measure it properly - designing of such a bench suite will take some time ;) For Pier, the biggest improvement will be the binary size (also an important thing!)

Please feel free to submit a PR with the necessary changes, so that you'll be acknowledged as a contributor :)

Sure! Here we go: https://github.com/pier-cli/pier/pull/98