Closed job closed 6 years ago
Hi @job,
on OpenBGPD, if the client's ASN is in the transit_free['asns']
list the filter is not applied at all:
On BIRD, there's a function that determines whether the filter must be applied or not, and it returns false
when the first ASN in the AS_PATH (that is, the client's ASN) is within the list:
That allows the route server to accept routes from a specific "transit free" ASN when they are announced on the session toward the transit free network itself. Does it work for you?
on OpenBGPD, if the client's ASN is in the transit_free['asns'] list the filter is not applied at all
OK - I think we should improve on this. If the client's ASN is in the transit_free['asns'] list, the client's should be popped from the list but the other transit-free ASNs should still be blocked on that one client.
Aka - if I add 1299 and 2914 to the list, arouteserver shouldn't accept 1299 behind 2914.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Pier Carlo Chiodi <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Hi @job https://github.com/job,
on OpenBGPD, if the client's ASN is in the transit_free['asns'] list the filter is not applied at all:
https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver/blob/3f336028f2b52993fee38b61d06267 eb58bd35f2/templates/openbgpd/filters.j2#L255-L262
On BIRD, there's a function that determines whether the filter must be applied or not, and it returns false when the first ASN in the AS_PATH (that is, the client's ASN) is within the list:
https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver/blob/3f336028f2b52993fee38b61d06267 eb58bd35f2/templates/bird/common.j2#L71-L90
That allows the route server to accept routes from a specific "transit free" ASN when they are announced on the session toward the transit free network itself. Does it work for you?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver/issues/21#issuecomment-372761997, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJY2H0BRg2eRfA_-kMgeyFmS8TmtoESks5teAnIgaJpZM4SlQZe .
Should I test this https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver/commit/03caa69014cb0ace66123c0413d53f037d646e9e commit?
Yes, it should work. I'm sorry for being slow to push updates on this, btw I've run regression tests and also a new test case to verify the changes and they work.
Imagine we add 2914 to
transit_free['asns']
but 2914 wishes to peer with an arouteserver instance - the_2914_
prefixes should be accepted on the direct 2914 sessions but not on any other sessions.AKA - pop 2914 from
transit_free_asns
list on the direct 2914 sessions - but not other sessions