Open Plompudu opened 1 year ago
Thanks. One of the autoEQ version didn't control the slope enough.
I am not sure the target should be the same. This one is likely bright in room. I ran the current optimiser and I got this:
Sounds better to me. WDYT?
If you are listening near field, then flat on axis is likely better.
Which one do you want?
EQ for flat LW:
EQ for Neumi BS5 computed from ErinsAudioCorner data
Preference Score 2.93 with EQ 4.54
Generated from http://github.com/pierreaubert/spinorama/generate_peqs.py v0.23
Dated: 2023-07-07-12:06:04
Preamp: -2.8 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 68 Hz Gain +2.65 dB Q 5.25
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 289 Hz Gain +2.50 dB Q 1.05
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 873 Hz Gain +2.94 dB Q 5.92
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 1180 Hz Gain -2.96 dB Q 2.78
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1704 Hz Gain +2.30 dB Q 5.59
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 8766 Hz Gain +0.31 dB Q 3.19
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 12662 Hz Gain -1.76 dB Q 2.54
EQ for higher score (and flatter PIR)
EQ for Neumi BS5 computed from ErinsAudioCorner data
Preference Score 2.93 with EQ 5.39
Generated from http://github.com/pierreaubert/spinorama/generate_peqs.py v0.23
Dated: 2023-07-07-12:10:06
Preamp: -2.9 dB
Filter 1: ON LS Fc 68 Hz Gain +2.72 dB Q 1.05
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 237 Hz Gain +2.10 dB Q 1.51
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 447 Hz Gain +1.53 dB Q 0.73
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 1141 Hz Gain -2.70 dB Q 3.43
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1594 Hz Gain +1.37 dB Q 4.58
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 5490 Hz Gain -1.43 dB Q 1.18
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 13092 Hz Gain -2.04 dB Q 1.16
Thanks!
I would prefer the flat on-axis. Could you do the same for the Sealed Measurement?
Describe the bug When looking at the Neumi BS5 in-room-Target "tilt" it's -10db@20kHz instead of the normal tilt
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior The Target Should be identical for with and without EQ
Desktop (please complete the following information):