Open jbarnoud opened 6 years ago
It's doable now since MDAnalysis is already in a conda channel. I think @jbarnoud's modifications are enough to create a conda package in a custom channel. If it succeeds, yes, we can offer a recipe for bioconda.
I can look into it next week.
modifications are enough to create a conda package in a custom channel.
@HubLot instead of creating our own custom conda channel, could we join bioconda channel? Their build process seems pretty robust (https://bioconda.github.io/contributing.html)?
Yes, it is the main objective. I just wanted to try the build first before submitting to bioconda.
OK, as you wish. But the build process proposed by Bioconda is pretty safe (everything is build upon Travis)
On 02/12/2018 02:05 PM, Pierre Poulain wrote:
OK, as you wish. But the build process proposed by Bioconda is pretty safe (everything is build upon Travis)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pierrepo/PBxplore/pull/172#issuecomment-364917066, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUWutK9Jiup-JXNpCu0Hp_ZZlMfSutXks5tUDc2gaJpZM4SBTBo.
For the record, the MDAnalysis conda package is on conda-forge.
So, I retried to build a conda package from the command line but now it fails... (either on the master or this PR branch) :
see this gist: https://gist.github.com/HubLot/18da1e2063001a1a51c73916ab4adff7
It seems it's an issue on Pytest but I'm not sure. I'll try to dig more into it but I'm quite busy in the next 2 weeks.
We were asking for MDAnalysis >= 0.11, but that version is ancient and the API changed rather drastically since then. I bumped the minimum required version to 0.16. The tests run fine with version 0.17 that should be preferred, especially on python 3.
@HubLot I do not know what should be done for the conda package to be rebuilt. It should now be possible to install PBxplore on python 3 with conda as MDAnalysis was the last obstacle.