switch16.js

[mhilcher]

New protocol for wireless remote control switch "Intertek 22541673" which can be bought in Germany for example in "Bauhaus". It's a set of 3 switches with one remote. The switches are self learning. I have only 1 set so that I do not exactly know where the id begins. At least this protocol is working for my switches.

[Icesory]

Can you pls post all your debug outputs from Homeduino for all buttons. Your protocol implementation looks not right.

And next time create not for every change a new branch. Make all your changes in one branch and you must open one pull request to implement all your changes.

[mhilcher]

Switch A On:

RF receive 260 2672 1270 10544 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020200020002000200020003

Off:

RF receive 260 2676 1274 10548 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020002020002000200020003

Switch B On:

RF receive 258 2680 1276 10560 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020200020002000200000203

Off:

RF receive 257 2672 1276 10536 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020002020002000200000203

Switch C On:

RF receive 261 2688 1275 10560 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020200020002000002020003

Off:

RF receive 259 2684 1280 10564 0 0 0 0 010200020002000002000200020200020002000200020000020200000202000200020002000200020002000200000200020200000200020002020002000002020003

Looks good for me..

[Icesory]

You use definitely the wrong patterns. I merge it later and fix it.

[mhilcher]

Sure, it’s hard to find a pattern if you have just one set with the same id and different units. The manufacturer writes about 67 million possible codes, which is 2^26. That means that 26 bytes would be used for coding, but what they don’t write is if this is a combination of id and unit or just the id, I guess it’s just the id, because then it would make sense to use 4 digits to decode 1 byte. 26 bytes for id and 4 bytes for the unit, 1 byte each state and inverted state makes 32 bytes = 128 digits. 01 at the start and 03 at the end would make 132 digits = pulses.

So I think you are right and I’m using the wrong pattern. With 4 digits it looks like this (first row for each switch is on, second is off):

A
RF receive 260 2672 1270 10544 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200  03

RF receive 260 2676 1274 10548 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200  03

B
RF receive 258 2680 1276 10560 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 03

RF receive 257 2672 1276 10536 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0002 03

C
RF receive 261 2688 1275 10560 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 03

RF receive 259 2684 1280 10564 0 0 0 0 01 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0200 0002 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0002 0002 0200 0002 0002 0002 0200 0200 0002 0200 03

[Icesory]

Yes so i see the patterns too. Feel free to change this by your self.