search

pimox / pimox7

Proxmox V7 for Raspberry Pi
1.7k stars 157 forks source link

Bookworm? #145

Open martin-braun opened 1 year ago

martin-braun commented 1 year ago

Is support for Debian 12 (Bookworm) planned? Do we have to wait for Proxmox to officially ship with Bookworm? There seem to be official instructions on getting Proxmox to run on Bookworm.

Thanks.

TheBossME commented 1 year ago

Read my comments, there is a stable proxmox 8.0-3 for arm64

Search for arm64 unofficial proxmox

Good luck.

And use this https://raspi.debian.net/tested/20230612_raspi_4_bookworm.img.xz

With this repo

https://github.com/jiangcuo/Proxmox-Arm64

martin-braun commented 1 year ago

Very helpful @TheBossME, dankeschön. :)

TheBossME commented 1 year ago

Hi Martin,

I will create a YT Video with all the needed steps to prepare a stable Proxmox installation while adding

deb https://mirrors.apqa.cn/proxmox/ pvearm8 main

Repository. I'm not using the pvetest repo.

The video will be in German language and maybe with English comments too.

If you have suggestions or questions, feel free to contact me.

Regards Beatrice

martin-braun commented 1 year ago

@TheBossME Thanks a lot Beatrice.

If you have suggestions or questions, feel free to contact me.

What is the name of your YouTube channel? I'd like to subscribe. I'm excited to see your video guide. :)

cvocvo commented 1 year ago

Read my comments, there is a stable proxmox 8.0-3 for arm64

Search for arm64 unofficial proxmox

Good luck.

And use this https://raspi.debian.net/tested/20230612_raspi_4_bookworm.img.xz

With this repo

https://github.com/jiangcuo/Proxmox-Arm64

Is it possible to upgrade to this via an existing pimox7 install? Or do we have to do a clean install?

donniedice commented 1 year ago

I had to manually install "libssl1.1_1.1.0g-2ubuntu4_arm64.deb" and "libtpms0_0.9.2-3.1_arm64.deb" to get the install to work. wget https://ubuntu.pkgs.org/18.04/ubuntu-main-arm64/libssl1.1_1.1.0g-2ubuntu4_arm64.deb.html https://debian.pkgs.org/12/debian-main-arm64/libtpms0_0.9.2-3.1_arm64.deb.html dpkg this stuff.

cvocvo commented 1 year ago

I had to manually install "libssl1.1_1.1.0g-2ubuntu4_arm64.deb" and "libtpms0_0.9.2-3.1_arm64.deb" to get the install to work. wget https://ubuntu.pkgs.org/18.04/ubuntu-main-arm64/libssl1.1_1.1.0g-2ubuntu4_arm64.deb.html https://debian.pkgs.org/12/debian-main-arm64/libtpms0_0.9.2-3.1_arm64.deb.html dpkg this stuff.

To clarify did you do something like this? (Just trying to figure out the right sequence of steps to upgrade/migrate)

donniedice commented 1 year ago

Ok ignore that, I was doing something wrong. I ended up getting things running using 2023-05-03-raspios-bullseye-arm64-lite.img.xz and Virtual Environment 7.4-16.

prafiles commented 12 months ago

Thanks guys! I got it working using the above mentioned links with slight modification. I've posted details on my blog here.

Basically in place upgrade does work, however I needed the apt mirror to be: deb https://mirrors.apqa.cn/proxmox/debian/pve bookworm port

After the upgrade, I'd to run apt-get autoremove which fixed some broken dependencies of things not getting compiled by the kernel automatically.

Davidorado1 commented 12 months ago

I got it working too. I used mainly this manual to do it. But I changed the order a bit: In one of my two raspi/Proxmox Setups I got an error while upgrading from bullseye to bookworm that I apparently wanted to uninstall proxmox. I stopped at this point and first changed the proxmox repository from the pimox7 to the other one: deb https://global.mirrors.apqa.cn/proxmox/debian/pve bookworm port After the next dist-upgrade, apt autoremove, reboot and another apt upgrade everything went really well.

martin-braun commented 12 months ago

@prafiles @Davidorado1 Not trying to imply something personal about you guys, but you both seem to emphasize that only the Chinese mirror is working. I'm happy that you report your success story, however:

It's a mirror, it shouldn't make a difference. This looks suspicious to me. I wouldn't want to take a mirror from China, not because of their people, but because of their rulers.

Davidorado1 commented 12 months ago

Well, I understand your concerns, but why do you come across this issue 2 months later? @TheBossME posted this github repository in his first answer. Did you even take a look at the repo and the wikipage? The guy behind the repository is the one who provides this mirror (as you can read here ). Sure, it can be suspicious, but that shouldn´t be new to you. Have a nice weekend!

martin-braun commented 12 months ago

@Davidorado1 Sorry, you are right. Tbh, I wasn't really concerned about that 2 months earlier until I gained some more knowledge about the current situation over there. But yes, the second link explains the mirror situation, which isn't a mirror by this definition. I didn't look into its details back then as I'm still busy on other stuff.

Thanks for sharing this with me though. Hopefully jiangcuo is legit. Wish you a nice weekend as well.

prafiles commented 11 months ago

@prafiles @Davidorado1 Not trying to imply something personal about you guys, but you both seem to emphasize that only the Chinese mirror is working. I'm happy that you report your success story, however:

It's a mirror, it shouldn't make a difference. This looks suspicious to me. I wouldn't want to take a mirror from China, not because of their people, but because of their rulers.

I agree with you 100%. I also do not wish to encourage the chinese mirror. I am indeed quite uncomfortable with the same.

However that is the only one that worked for me including trying CDN DNS Servers like 1.1.1.1 as well as my usual self-hosted recursive Unbound server. I tried multiple things, but as discussed above, I was not comfortable with the path of removing all of my packages and then install pve server. If an alternate path works, I'll readily retry and will be glad to assist in anyway I can.

My intent to share this result was to maybe help point someone in the direction to help them to do so. If it helps, I am based out of India, if mirrors behave differently for different locations.

martin-braun commented 11 months ago

@prafiles Thank you for the feedback, which confirms my conclusion. Although called "mirror", it's a custom repository adjusted by jiangcuo to work with the PI. I investigated his Chinese blog, he seems to be legit, however we know how relationships between companies and governments are quite different in China compared to the Western world, we wouldn't even noticed interference by higher ups, unless you have the time and dedication to audit all the package sources in that "mirror".

I will keep this open for the sake of finding "official" alternatives (as official as it can get).