Open ghost opened 3 years ago
I guess a clean implementation would be acceptable, assuming it truly translates to proper VTODOS, and that syncing both ways results in no data loss.
Does Google's tasks application have concepts that translate well? (E.g.: lists == collections, and tasks == todo)?
Seems to me so. I am not a Google employee though, but looks a lot like it is so.
As far as I understand, Google's Caldav rejects VTODO files, because it deems them unfit for a Calendar application (and considers a piece of the Tasks application).
Would synchronization with dedicated tasks (as opposed to calendar) services be considered?