search

pinakimukherjee / morelinq

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morelinq
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Downloads are not signed. #70

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I've tried to reference 'MoreLinq'  from signed DLL and got Error   609 Assembly 
generation failed -- Referenced assembly 'MoreLinq' does not have a strong name.
It will be good to have signed downloads and downloads with source code
Loading source files individually is not very convinient(or may be I am not 
familiar enouph with SVN (:) )

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Michael....@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2011 at 1:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The issue 30 http://code.google.com/p/morelinq/issues/detail?id=30&can=1 marked 
as fixed in 2010, but downloads are still old 2009

Original comment by Michael....@gmail.com on 4 Sep 2011 at 12:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
http://code.google.com/p/morelinq/issues/detail?id=66  Mentions the NuGet 
package for MoreLinq and it is not signed / strong name.  I can manually build 
from latest source to get the strong naming, but would be nice to "set it and 
forget it" with the NuGet.

Also, is it possible to package the .XML documentation with the NuGet .dll file 
to get nice documentation in intellisense and object browser?

Original comment by jomt...@gmail.com on 20 Sep 2012 at 2:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Downloads have been deprecated[1] for Google Code Project Hosting. However, the 
NuGet package[2] does have a signed binary as well as the XML documentation.

[1] 
http://google-opensource.blogspot.ch/2013/05/a-change-to-google-code-download-se
rvice.html
[2] https://www.nuget.org/packages/morelinq/

Original comment by azizatif on 6 Aug 2014 at 8:09