fix the start script for alertmanager when enabling numa

KanShiori commented 9 months ago

What problem does this PR solve?

Close #2329

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

Unit test
Integration test
Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Deploy a cluster with a alertmanager.

alertmanager_servers:
  - host: 127.0.0.1
    numa_node: "0"

Check the start script of this alertmanager.

#!/bin/bash
set -e

DEPLOY_DIR=/tidb-deploy/alertmanager-9093
cd "${DEPLOY_DIR}" || exit 1

# WARNING: This file was auto-generated. Do not edit!
#          All your edit might be overwritten!

exec > >(tee -i -a "/tidb-deploy/alertmanager-9093/log/alertmanager.log")
exec 2>&1
exec numactl --cpunodebind=0 --membind=0 bin/alertmanager/alertmanager \
    --config.file="conf/alertmanager.yml" \
    --storage.path="/tidb-data/alertmanager-9093" \
    --data.retention=120h \
    --log.level="info" \
    --web.listen-address="0.0.0.0:9093" \
    --web.external-url="http://127.0.0.1:9093" \
    --cluster.peer="127.0.0.1:9094" \
    --cluster.listen-address="127.0.0.1:9094"

No code

Code changes

Has exported function/method change
Has exported variable/fields change
Has interface methods change
Has persistent data change

Side effects

Possible performance regression
Increased code complexity
Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
Need to update the documentation

Release notes:

NONE

codecov-commenter commented 9 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (0a96dad) 55.51% compared to head (a519d44) 55.37%.

:exclamation: Current head a519d44 differs from pull request most recent head e76f364. Consider uploading reports for the commit e76f364 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2337 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 55.51% 55.37% -0.14% ========================================== Files 328 328 Lines 34823 34823 ========================================== - Hits 19330 19282 -48 - Misses 13180 13231 +51 + Partials 2313 2310 -3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [cluster](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | `44.71% <ø> (-0.16%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dm](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | `25.44% <ø> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | | [playground](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | `15.31% <ø> (ø)` | | | [tiup](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | `33.56% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pingcap/tiup/pull/2337/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap) | `22.35% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pingcap#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 9 months ago

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

2023-12-20 08:47:17.954031292 +0000 UTC m=+1037128.991258219: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by breezewish.

kaaaaaaang commented 9 months ago

/lgtm

kaaaaaaang commented 9 months ago

/approve

ti-chi-bot[bot] commented 9 months ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kaaaaaaang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/pingcap/tiup/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [kaaaaaaang] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

pingcap / tiup