Closed katcatalano closed 5 years ago
Double checked and this tag was scanned at the times that these fish were captured, so there is no tag_id type-o. Next step will be to check id analysis and see if these fish were compared genetically.
These fish were in the genepop but did not match to each other as identity matches in curves even though they have the same tag_id. @katcatalano will look into this and report back a genotyping error number which will clarify if the genotypes were close to the match threshold or if there may be a lab error somewhere. @agdedrick this is the same fish for your purposes.
The following fish have a different gen_id, but the same tag_id, so they didn't match with Cervus but matched with their tag_id. Based on my code, there was only a 6.3% mismatch in the genotypes of these fish, which means Cervus should have identified these fish as an identity match.
APCL15_373270/ L3005/ gen_id= 1298 and APCL16_292/ L5054/ gen_id= 1670
I think that we may need to adjust our Cervus parameters and re-do the identity analysis, and I'll continue this comment on the appropriate issue #22
As commented in #22 I started an identity analysis in Colony to find regenotyped individuals that Cervus may have missed (because it can't handle missing genotypes). I will hand the output over to Michelle for identity post-processing to be sure these results make sense and check them against Cervus results.
Adding @agdedrick as an assignee in this issue to keep her in the loop, and I will post updates here rather than #22
L2616, gen_id=1481, tag_id=985153000375244 L4938, gen_id=4605, tag_id=985153000375244 Maybe they just didn't match genetically?