Closed stv0g closed 1 year ago
I support the suggestion.
I basically second this, but we also should check commits just saying Bug fix
on review
I support as well! Could we switch to https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ ?
Then we could also generate nice CHANGELOGs. Users want to know what is in a new commit (bugs, features etc..)
I like the idea of the conventional commits spec. Especially, because we could get rid of our own script to validate the commit messages.
I have found this go tool (https://github.com/aevea/commitsar) to check for conventional commit compliance. Pro: it has GitHub actions support. Con: dependency to install when running locally.
How are we going to handle renovate bot commit messages that are not compliant with conventional commit style?
How are we going to handle renovate bot commit messages that are not compliant with conventional commit style?
Renovate supports conventional commit message https://docs.renovatebot.com/semantic-commits/
Its one of the major reasons new contributions are failing the CI for..