pion / stun

A Go implementation of STUN
https://pion.ly/
MIT License
601 stars 91 forks source link

Remove Dockerfile #135

Closed stv0g closed 1 year ago

stv0g commented 1 year ago

The Dockerfile does not serve any useful purpose. It also deviates from pions goassets. And hence, in an effort to harmonize the pion codebase we should remove it.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 98.16% // Head: 98.16% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (4c31814) compared to base (123431d). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #135 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.16% 98.16% ======================================= Files 19 19 Lines 1577 1577 ======================================= Hits 1548 1548 Misses 23 23 Partials 6 6 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | go | `98.16% <ø> (ø)` | | | wasm | `57.61% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pion#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pion). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pion)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.