Closed dmgr closed 9 years ago
I would refrain from calling machine
directly as this is implementation detail and leaky abstraction at best. I would imagine it's possible to just call state
which will be forwarded to machine anyway but doesn't depend on it. Could you try that?
Hi Peter, yes, using just state
instead of machine.state
works fine.
Coverage increased (+0.21%) to 97.59% when pulling dd6f5024dd1181f57889856363c02fda184714ec on dmgr:master into bc254de558939f79c0e5aa0944fdb99776627463 on peter-murach:master.