Possible that there is no problem here. However, in the human entry (IQEC2_HUMAN) what was originally the canonical sequence (Q5JU85-1) has been removed. I presume it's because an incorrect splicing event was used (the current canonical Q5JU85-2 has an insert relative to Q5JU85-1). The issue is that the corresponding mouse protein has a canonical isoform Q5DU25-1 that matches the one removed from the human entry. It makes me wonder if the mouse entry needs a similar revision.
Possible that there is no problem here. However, in the human entry (IQEC2_HUMAN) what was originally the canonical sequence (Q5JU85-1) has been removed. I presume it's because an incorrect splicing event was used (the current canonical Q5JU85-2 has an insert relative to Q5JU85-1). The issue is that the corresponding mouse protein has a canonical isoform Q5DU25-1 that matches the one removed from the human entry. It makes me wonder if the mouse entry needs a similar revision.