Like others in this forum, I'm also trying to estimate power for an interaction term. My data are drawn from a large, longitudinal twin study.
This is my model:
model2<-lmer(PBF_E~polyvctzce18*zrpgsSCZ+(1|familyid), data=Erisk)summary(model2)
PBF_E represents a continuous measure of psychopathology standardized to mean=100, SD=15.
polyvctzce18 represents a measure of victimization exposure with four levels (0,1,2,3+), but which I'm treating as continuous for the moment
zrpgsSCZ represents a continuous measure of genetic risk for psychopathology
familyid is the number assigned to each twin pair participating in the study. Each individual participant (twin) is nested within a single twin pair (or single family) with a single co-twin.
The results of this model are as follows:
> `Linear mixed model fit by REML ['lmerMod']
> Formula: PBF_E ~ polyvctzce18 * zrpgsSCZ + (1 | familyid)
> Data: Erisk
>
> REML criterion at convergence: 14705.9
>
> Scaled residuals:
> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
> -2.1785 -0.6499 -0.0830 0.5524 3.3487
>
> Random effects:
> Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
> familyid (Intercept) 53.46 7.312
> Residual 114.27 10.690
> Number of obs: 1860, groups: familyid, 949
>
> Fixed effects:
> Estimate Std. Error t value
> (Intercept) 95.5601 0.3972 240.591
> polyvctzce18 7.6976 0.3289 23.407
> zrpgsSCZ 1.0134 0.3802 2.666
> polyvctzce18:zrpgsSCZ -0.3772 0.3200 -1.179
>
> Correlation of Fixed Effects:
> (Intr) plyv18 zrpSCZ
> polyvctzc18 -0.499
> zrpgsSCZ 0.052 -0.022
> plyvc18:SCZ -0.025 0.026 -0.494`
I'm trying to conduct a power analysis to see if my original model might be underpowered to detect an interaction between victimization exposure (polyvctzce18) and genetic risk (zrpgsSCZ). To see what sized interaction I am sufficiently well-powered to detect, I've tried setting the effect size of the interaction to various levels using code from this forum.
For example:
fixef(model2)["polyvctzce18:zrpgsSCZ"]<-5powerSim(model2,test=fixed("polyvctzce18:zrpgsSCZ","z"), nsim=100)
My problem is that it seems no matter what value I set the effect size to, the estimated power is always 0.00 (0.00, 3.62), probably because my 100 simulations generate 100 errors.
Hi there!
Like others in this forum, I'm also trying to estimate power for an interaction term. My data are drawn from a large, longitudinal twin study.
This is my model:
model2<-lmer(PBF_E~polyvctzce18*zrpgsSCZ+(1|familyid), data=Erisk)
summary(model2)
PBF_E represents a continuous measure of psychopathology standardized to mean=100, SD=15. polyvctzce18 represents a measure of victimization exposure with four levels (0,1,2,3+), but which I'm treating as continuous for the moment zrpgsSCZ represents a continuous measure of genetic risk for psychopathology familyid is the number assigned to each twin pair participating in the study. Each individual participant (twin) is nested within a single twin pair (or single family) with a single co-twin.
The results of this model are as follows:
I'm trying to conduct a power analysis to see if my original model might be underpowered to detect an interaction between victimization exposure (polyvctzce18) and genetic risk (zrpgsSCZ). To see what sized interaction I am sufficiently well-powered to detect, I've tried setting the effect size of the interaction to various levels using code from this forum.
For example:
fixef(model2)["polyvctzce18:zrpgsSCZ"]<-5
powerSim(model2,test=fixed("polyvctzce18:zrpgsSCZ","z"), nsim=100)
My problem is that it seems no matter what value I set the effect size to, the estimated power is always 0.00 (0.00, 3.62), probably because my 100 simulations generate 100 errors.
Can anyone tell what I'm doing to cause these errors? I'm not much of a statistician or programmer, so any help or insight is much appreciated!