Open avdvloet opened 3 years ago
It sounds like you want this paragraph from the Test examples vignette:
If you were (for some reason) especially interested in the significance for the dummy variable period2 you could use a z-test. This test uses the value Pr(>|z|) reported in the summary above.
doTest(gm1, fixed("period2", "z"))
Sorry, but I still don't know what is meant by that.
It says on that page that you shouldn't test main effects when they are in a significant interaction term, which in the case for my model. But then what is the solution, can I still do it in some way? Or is the doTest function just used to get the effect size you then want to use for your power analysis?
simr shouldn't have any problem testing the main effect despite the significant interaction. That advice is more of a generally best-practice thing but there are exceptions so if that test makes sense for your model it should still work.
Hi,
I want to perform a power analysis for a mixed linear model (lmer, lme4 package) of the following type:
continuous variable ~ discrete variable a * discrete variable b + (1| discrete variable c: discrete variable b)
If I run the appropriate anova on it, I get significance for the interaction term. Yet, I am interested in the power for a significant effect size for one of the levels of discrete variable a. In other words I would like to run the power analysis for a main effect, while my model contains a significant interaction.
First of all, is this possible? If yes, I've read some things about it in the appendix S1 of your paper, using e.g. doTest(fm1, fcompare(~ recipe + temp)) in one of the examples there. What is the link with running a PA on a main effect? How should I use this function for my case and how should interpret this in using it for my power analysis?
Thanks in advance!