Closed puellanivis closed 9 months ago
Alright, I feel this is pretty solid now. I’ll be merging it shortly.
Alright, I feel this is pretty solid now. I’ll be merging it shortly.
I plan to do some testing this weekend, but I'm sure I won't find anything wrong. Sounds like a great job, thanks!
I plan to do some testing this weekend, but I'm sure I won't find anything wrong. Sounds like a great job, thanks!
I’ll hold off until Monday then. More broad testing is better than the very narrow testing that I’ve done so far.
LGTM, since we are adding support for perm at Open for the server implementation maybe we can also add them in requestFromPacket
for the request server, but we can also delay this to a future PR if required.
Adding support in requestFromPacket
was simple enough. Just a one-liner. Adding deeper support to the MemFile implementation to act as an example would take much more work, so I’ll leave that part for a later PR… or an existing PR. :trollface:
Adding support in
requestFromPacket
was simple enough. Just a one-liner. Adding deeper support to the MemFile implementation to act as an example would take much more work, so I’ll leave that part for a later PR… or an existing PR. :trollface:
Thank you!
Two things in this:
File.handle
after aClose
which can then be used to ensure that there is no use-after-close issue: https://github.com/pkg/sftp/issues/572Client
code, we can now easily implement the PR changes in: https://github.com/pkg/sftp/pull/567