What I believe we agreed to was that the MVP needs to include:
Validation for maintainer adding the support info for their modules
Validation of local file
Validation of package.json which includes links support info
Listing support info for end users wanting to understand the support info provided
by the modules they are using in their deployments. Agreed that MVP can focus on
using information which available locally versus pulling canonical version from remote
repository,
We had a meeting yesterday to agree on what the MVP would be. Some notes on the discussion in: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1THGBeRMBkfUoQ6VqFXG9nNM-j4vbrfmk3lIfHTjBea
What I believe we agreed to was that the MVP needs to include:
Validation for maintainer adding the support info for their modules
Listing support info for end users wanting to understand the support info provided by the modules they are using in their deployments. Agreed that MVP can focus on using information which available locally versus pulling canonical version from remote repository,