Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
FYI:
petimixa = PEterTInekeMIrellaXAvier
Used this as our family-account
Original comment by pfgroots...@gmail.com
on 23 Nov 2013 at 11:17
statement is corrected in release 0.17
Original comment by pfgroots...@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2013 at 8:18
Thanks, Peter -- good catch. You are correct that there is an extra parameter,
but it was not fixed in 0.17 -- there was an unrelated change to the line in
that release. I have the fix queued up for 0.18.
This being Javascript, the fourth parameter is simply ignored by
cc.fieldIsolate(). In any case, it's a benign error. Note that the expressions
for the third and fourth parameters are equivalent. It appears that I
introduced the error in r245 while debugging the ISO syllable almost a year ago.
Original comment by paul.kimpel@digm.com
on 29 Dec 2013 at 4:15
Correction -- the additional parameter was introduced in r271 of the
retro-b5500 repo.
Original comment by paul.kimpel@digm.com
on 29 Dec 2013 at 4:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
petim...@planet.nl
on 20 Nov 2013 at 9:03