Closed JhonathanLepidus closed 2 years ago
Some of the citation-style files were not upgraded correctly. We're going to fix them as soon as possible.
@NateWr, could you take a look at this?
The citation-style files were upgraded in order to match with the corresponding files in the v1.0.2 branch of CSL.
Thanks for this @JhonathanLepidus, and especially for upgrading to CSL 1.0.2. :+1:
@asmecher what is your feeling about this change for stable-3_3_0
? Should we only update CSL styles at the main
branch or is this safe enough to update for stable-3_3_0
? It seems like there are some significant updates.
I would prefer targeting only main
for significant updates, but if you're really interested in stable-3_3_0
updates being distributed and can do a side-by-side comparison of the main formats (listed in CitationStyleLanguagePlugin::getCitationStyles
) before and after the changes, I'm open to updating them.
If it helps, I checked with SciELO and 3.3.0 is not a huge priority for them; they're content to wait for 3.4.0. But the above still applies if it's a priority for you outside of SciELO's work!
Related to the issues https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/5629 and https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/6700